Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 44.0 to 36.1.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1483 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1474 |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1489 |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.