Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 39.7.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1330 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1443 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1392 |
Long Context Too close to call
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.