Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.0

Rank #123 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 47.8 to 39.7.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $2 for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-FlashQwen3.5 35B-A3B
ProviderXiaomiAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.342.0
Released2025-12-162026-02-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$2
Results tracked2128

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena WebDev13301254
SciCode25.9%29.3%
LMArena Coding14431410
ALE-Bench737.95—

Reasoning Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashQwen3.5 35B-A3B
CritPt0%0.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14201400
Chess Puzzles—10%
DTBench—80%
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.52

Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Math13961404
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Expert14251408
GPQA Diamond—83.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%

Multilingual Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English13921378
LMArena Chinese14621457
LMArena French14291412
LMArena German13951367
LMArena Japanese13251325
LMArena Korean13581356
LMArena Russian13871376
LMArena Spanish14201392

Instruction Following Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following13921379

Long Context Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query14091389

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Text14111395
LMArena Creative Writing13751346
LMArena Multi-Turn14041390

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 35B-A3B lists at $0.25 and $2.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper