Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Solar Pro4

MiMo-V2-Flash and Solar Pro4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Solar Pro4 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Solar Pro4 leads 40.1 to 36.1.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
  • Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 262K.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Flash and Solar Pro4 specifications
MiMo-V2-FlashSolar Pro4
ProviderXiaomiUpstage
Noometry Index41.342.1
Released2025-12-162026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K524K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$1.20
Results tracked2118

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Solar Pro4 leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashSolar Pro4
LMArena WebDev13301371
LMArena Coding14431437
SciCode25.9%—
ALE-Bench737.95—

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashSolar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts14201399
CritPt0%—

Math Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashSolar Pro4
LMArena Math13961416

Knowledge Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashSolar Pro4
LMArena Expert14251427

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English13921361
LMArena Chinese14621415
LMArena French14291397
LMArena German13951364
LMArena Japanese13251309
LMArena Korean13581382
LMArena Russian13871360
LMArena Spanish14201401

Instruction Following Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashSolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following13921377

Long Context Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query14091381

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashSolar Pro4
LMArena Text14111386
LMArena Creative Writing13751316
LMArena Multi-Turn14041385

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Solar Pro4?

MiMo-V2-Flash and Solar Pro4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Solar Pro4?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Solar Pro4 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper