Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen2.5-Max
MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 40.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 41.8 to 36.1.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 40.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2025-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5-Max leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1359 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1360 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.53 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1369 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1337 |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1377 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1358 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen2.5-Max?
MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 40.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?
Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen2.5-Max share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.