Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 5 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 41.9% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | 1330 |
| SciCode | 41.9% | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | 737.95 |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1420 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1392 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.