Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Phi-4 Mini
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 25.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 128K |
| Max output | 66K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 10.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Phi-4 Mini?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Phi-4 Mini?
Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Phi-4 Mini share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.