Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Phi-4 Mini
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 40.0 to 28.1.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Phi-4 Mini?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.