Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 5.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3 Ultra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 1 category and Nemotron 3 Ultra in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Ultra leads 52.5 to 39.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 40.3% for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $2.20 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2026-06-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 38.1 (#182)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 40.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1468 |
| FrontierCode | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 43.5% |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 23.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 22.7% |
Reasoning Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 31.0 (#82)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 3.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1452 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 90.1% |
| LMCA | — | 36.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.17 |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 35.3 (#187)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1457 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 2% |
Knowledge Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 52.5 (#61)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1472 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.4% |
Multilingual Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 53.5 (#64)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1427 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1497 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1472 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1471 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1386 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1417 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1454 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 74.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1418 |
Long Context Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1437 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 66.3 (#36)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1398 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1411 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1692 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 5.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3 Ultra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra lists at $0.50 and $2.20.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Ultra scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Ultra has 30.