Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 4 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 40.9 to 36.1.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1396 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1425 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1462 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1392 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.