Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 24.9 to 18.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 36% for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Both cost about the same: $0.14 input and $0.28 output per million tokens.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Flash and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
MiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 3 Super
ProviderXiaomiNVIDIA
Noometry Index41.340.1
Released2025-12-162026-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$0.45
Results tracked2121

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 3 Super
SciCode25.9%36%
LMArena Coding14431403
ALE-Bench737.95213.9
LMArena WebDev1330—
WeirdML—38%

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 3 Super
CritPt0%3.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts14201386
NYT Connections (extended)—15.4%

Math Nemotron 3 Super leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Math13961380
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%

Knowledge Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert14251398

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English13921355
LMArena Chinese14621432
LMArena French14291405
LMArena German13951341
LMArena Russian13871336
LMArena Spanish14201417
LMArena Japanese1325—
LMArena Korean1358—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following13921347

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query14091362

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text14111378
LMArena Creative Writing13751317
LMArena Multi-Turn14041369

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Nemotron 3 Super?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Nemotron 3 Super share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper