Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Nemotron 3 Super
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.6V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 5 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.6V leads 26.5 to 17.9.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for GLM-4.6V.
- Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2026-03-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | $0.45 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1403 |
| SciCode | — | 36% |
| WeirdML | — | 38% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 213.9 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1386 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 15.4% |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1381 |
Knowledge Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1397 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1356 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1430 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | — | 1404 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1417 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1347 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1362 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132), Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1369 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Nemotron 3 Super?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.6V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6V lists at $0.30 and $0.90.
Is GLM-4.6V or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Nemotron 3 Super share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.