Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs MiniMax M1

MiMo-V2-Flash and MiniMax M1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 40.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and MiniMax M1 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 53.1.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.55 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
  • MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Flash and MiniMax M1 specifications
MiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax M1
ProviderXiaomiMiniMax
Noometry Index41.340.3
Released2025-12-162025-06-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K1M
Max output66K40K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.55
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$2.20
Results tracked2118

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax M1 leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Coding14431359
LMArena WebDev1330—
SciCode25.9%—
ALE-Bench737.95—

Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts14201339
CritPt0%—

Math Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Math13961361

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Expert14251317

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English13921319
LMArena Chinese14621360
LMArena French14291370
LMArena German13951350
LMArena Japanese13251217
LMArena Korean13581266
LMArena Russian13871329
LMArena Spanish14201353

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following13921312

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query14091326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Text14111343
LMArena Creative Writing13751298
LMArena Multi-Turn14041335

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than MiniMax M1?

MiMo-V2-Flash and MiniMax M1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 40.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or MiniMax M1?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.55 and $2.20.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and MiniMax M1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper