Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Ring-2.6-1T
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 40.1.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Ring-2.6-1T?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.