Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Reka Flash 3

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Reka Flash 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Reka Flash 3 Reka

36.8

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 43.7.
  • Reka Flash 3 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 66K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Reka Flash 3 specifications
MiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
ProviderXiaomiReka
Noometry Index50.336.8
Released2026-09-212025-03-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M66K
Max output131K59K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.20
Results tracked192

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Reka Flash 3: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
LMArena WebDev1629—
SciCode60.9%—
LMArena Coding1534—
ALE-Bench1,158—

Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Reka Flash 3: 30.4

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
APEX-Agents59.5%—
BALROG—29.2%

Reasoning Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Reka Flash 3: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
CritPt26.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1512—

Math Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Reka Flash 3: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
ProofBench70%—
LMArena Math1494—

Knowledge Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Reka Flash 3: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
LMArena Expert1543—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Reka Flash 3: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
LMArena Vision1264—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Reka Flash 3: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
LMArena Non-English1474—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena Russian1480—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Reka Flash 3: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
LMArena Instruction Following1493—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Reka Flash 3: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
LMArena Longer Query1501—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Reka Flash 3: 43.7

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProReka Flash 3
LMArena Text1492—
LMArena Creative Writing1468—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1228
LMArena Multi-Turn1464—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Reka Flash 3?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Reka Flash 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Reka Flash 3?

Reka Flash 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Reka Flash 3 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Reka Flash 3 has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper