Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.6 Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 39.0.
- Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | 326.4 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1494 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.