Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 32.8.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | 621.92 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1494 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.5 Plus?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.