Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Glimmer 30B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Muse Glimmer 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer 30B leads 69.9 to 66.8.
- Both cost about the same: $0.43 input and $0.87 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 55.5 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 1 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1494 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | — |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer 30B leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Muse Glimmer 30B: 69.9
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1798 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Muse Glimmer 30B?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Muse Glimmer 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Glimmer 30B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer 30B has 1.