Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Mistral Nemo
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1494 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Mistral Nemo?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.