Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Omni costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 9 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 39.1.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderXiaomiXiaomi
Noometry Index50.343.6
Released2026-09-212026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M262K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.28
Results tracked1918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding15341466
LMArena WebDev1629—
SciCode60.9%—
ALE-Bench1,158—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), MiMo-V2-Omni: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
APEX-Agents59.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts15121445
CritPt26.6%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math14941430
ProofBench70%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert15431449

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision12641228

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English14741404
LMArena Chinese15291465
LMArena Russian14801412
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1399
LMArena Japanese—1317
LMArena Korean—1355
LMArena Spanish—1434

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following14931428

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query15011442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text14921423
LMArena Creative Writing14681392
LMArena Multi-Turn14641445

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Omni costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper