Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 27.6.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderXiaomiMicrosoft
Noometry Index48.527.9
Released2026-09-212024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked1935

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding15041093
LMArena WebDev1637—
SciCode51.3%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14821072
CritPt12%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14681111
ProofBench63%—
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert15011045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14341021
LMArena Chinese15111021
LMArena French14751076
LMArena Russian14091022
LMArena Spanish14561085
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14631053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14631044

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14551073
LMArena Creative Writing14001037
LMArena Multi-Turn14511018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper