Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Yi-1.5-34B

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 42.2 to 14.8.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
MiMo-V2.6-FlashYi-1.5-34B
ProviderXiaomi01.AI
Noometry Index48.530.6
Released2026-09-212024-05-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked1921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding15041169
LMArena WebDev1637—
SciCode51.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14821160
CritPt12%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math14681182
ProofBench63%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Expert15011144
GPQA Diamond—32%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English14341121
LMArena Chinese15111213
LMArena French14751156
LMArena Russian14091091
LMArena Spanish14561121
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021
LMArena Korean—1005

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14631139

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query14631143

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text14551173
LMArena Creative Writing14001135
LMArena Multi-Turn14511153

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Yi-1.5-34B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Yi-1.5-34B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper