Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Codellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderMetaXiaomi
Noometry Index30.848.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding10461504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10321482
CritPt—12%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math10561468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert—1501

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English10111434
LMArena Chinese9761511
LMArena French—1475
LMArena Russian—1409
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10281463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query10131463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text10661455
LMArena Creative Writing10321400
LMArena Multi-Turn10151451

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper