Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

37.3

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Step 3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 21.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 51.3% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and 40% for Step 3.7 Flash.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $1.11 for Step 3.7 Flash.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Step 3.7 Flash specifications
MiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 3.7 Flash
ProviderXiaomiStepFun
Noometry Index48.537.3
Released2026-09-212026-05-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M256K
Max output131K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$1.11
Results tracked195

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 3.7 Flash
SciCode51.3%40%
LMArena WebDev1637—
LMArena Coding1504—
ALE-Bench—694.12

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 3.7 Flash
CritPt12%2.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—39.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts1482—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 3.7 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—68.5%
ProofBench63%—
LMArena Math1468—

Knowledge Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Expert1501—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1434—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1475—
LMArena Russian1409—
LMArena Spanish1456—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1463—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1463—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1455—
LMArena Creative Writing1400—
LMArena Multi-Turn1451—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Step 3.7 Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Step 3.7 Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper