Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 30.1.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Granite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index37.448.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev11921637
LMArena Coding13121504
SciCode—51.3%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12931482
CritPt—12%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math13121468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert13091501

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English12611434
LMArena Chinese13371511
LMArena Russian12401409
LMArena French—1475
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12691463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12751463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text12901455
LMArena Creative Writing12511400
LMArena Multi-Turn12681451

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper