Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

47.8

Rank #49 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

38.6

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 8 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 39.7.

Side by side

Grok 4 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Grok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index47.838.6
Released2025-07-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 49.9 (#44), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding14081316
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.1 (#62), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.9 (#59), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts14091299
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
Chess Puzzles28%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.46—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 46.5 (#58), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math14221305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.7 (#50), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert14171279
GPQA Diamond87%—
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.1 (#89), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Vision1211—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 52.0 (#98), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English14031290
LMArena Chinese14281331
LMArena Russian14091324
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1396—
LMArena Korean1376—
LMArena Spanish1419—

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.4 (#4), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following13871287
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query14091307
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 58.7 (#111), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text14121321
LMArena Creative Writing13971328
LMArena Multi-Turn14161292
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper