Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 39.0.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1468 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | — |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3.6 Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.