Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 36.1.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1314 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1299 |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1298 |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1289 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1275 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.