Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nova Premier 1.0

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 33.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nova Premier 1.0 specifications
MiMo-V2.6-FlashNova Premier 1.0
ProviderXiaomiAmazon
Noometry Index48.538.3
Released2026-09-212025-04-30
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output131K10K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$12.50
Results tracked196

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNova Premier 1.0
LMArena WebDev1637—
SciCode51.3%—
LMArena Coding1504—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNova Premier 1.0
Kagi LLM Benchmark—44.8%
CritPt12%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1482—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNova Premier 1.0
ProofBench63%—
Omni-MATH—35%
LMArena Math1468—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNova Premier 1.0
MMLU-Pro—72.6%
GPQA (HELM)—51.8%
LMArena Expert1501—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Non-English1434—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1475—
LMArena Russian1409—
LMArena Spanish1456—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNova Premier 1.0
IFEval—80.3%
LMArena Instruction Following1463—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Longer Query1463—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Text1455—
LMArena Creative Writing1400—
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn1451—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Nova Premier 1.0?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Nova Premier 1.0?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper