Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2.5 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 26.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 63% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and 4% for MiniMax-M2.5.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.5.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 38.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-02-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 205K |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | 1387 |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1381 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 75.8% |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 68.3% |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 618.17 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 42.7% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -23.16 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1372 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 55.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 63.7% |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.68 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 63% | 4% |
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1378 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1379 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), MiniMax-M2.5: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1338 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | 1362 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1354 |
| LMArena German | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1171 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1232 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1353 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1366 |
| CL-bench | — | 11.4% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.3% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1359 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1364 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1361 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than MiniMax-M2.5?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiniMax-M2.5?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.5 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 48.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax-M2.5 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.