Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 22.1.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1476 |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1447 |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1478 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | 1469 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1457 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1445 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 43.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.