Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.5 Plus
MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.4 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 Plus in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 36.8.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | 621.92 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1436 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.4 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.5 Plus?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.