Model comparison

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.3 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 46.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 36.5% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 25.4% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
  • Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
  • Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.342.9
Released2026-06-122026-02-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output262K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.95$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$4$2.40
Results tracked1915

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.5 Plus
ALE-Bench886.23621.92
DeepSWE30.5%—
FrontierCode30.1%—
LMArena WebDev1473—
SciCode47.5%—
WeirdML54.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 25,0830.54
APEX-Agents37.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.5 Plus
Chess Puzzles21%22%
Epoch Capabilities Index149.97146.78
SimpleBench57.9%—
CritPt10%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Surface Evolver Bench48.8%—

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)54%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond87.9%84.8%
SimpleQA Verified36.5%25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.3 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper