Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 56.4 to 52.0.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1488 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1483 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1473 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | 1489 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.6 vs 43.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.