Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5 costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 61.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 43.1% for MiMo-V2.5 and 50.2% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderXiaomiXiaomi
Noometry Index43.445.2
Released2026-04-222026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$0.87
Results tracked2327

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena WebDev14381479
SciCode43.1%50.2%
LMArena Coding14691503
ALE-Bench513.95899.8

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
CritPt3.7%4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14501488
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProofBench16%22%
LMArena Math14361481

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert14601503

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision1247—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English14041449
LMArena Chinese14681507
LMArena French14471488
LMArena German14211458
LMArena Japanese13061412
LMArena Korean13631437
LMArena Russian13951450
LMArena Spanish14161471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14341477

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14451483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text14281465
LMArena Creative Writing13931440
LMArena Multi-Turn14451477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5 costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 43.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper