Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen Plus
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Plus in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 36.8 to 23.3.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1328 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1303 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Qwen Plus?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen Plus?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen Plus better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen Plus share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.