Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen Plus
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen Plus in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 17.8% for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 17.8% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 48.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen Plus?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen Plus share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.