Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.8 to 49.2.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1318 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1302 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1315 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | 1272 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1275 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.