Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 40.2 to 18.0.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1436 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.