Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 18.3.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.