Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 38.6 to 13.3.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.8 | 32.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1502 | 1236 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1477 | — |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1487 | 1220 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1480 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1489 | — |
| LMArena German | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1233 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.