Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 40.0 to 22.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 53.8% for Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2024-05-14 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 34.4 (#236), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1261 | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| WeirdML | 24.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
| HumanEval+ | 75.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 67.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.6 (#102), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 14.6% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 21.7 (#215), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1488 |
| DTBench | 53.8% | 84.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.36 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.9 | — |
| PIQA | 87.5% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 22.1 (#281), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1481 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.3% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| Omni-MATH | 30.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 61.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#260), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1233 | 1503 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.8% | — |
| MMLU | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 36.0 (#81), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1141 | — |
| Video-MME | 70.3% | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 42.9 (#189), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1278 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1295 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1258 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1262 | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1252 | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | 1221 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1243 | 1471 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 66.8 (#205), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1258 | 1477 |
| IFEval | 83.1% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#187), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1284 | 1483 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.7 (#196), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.