Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Ring-2.6-1T
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#74); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.4 to 40.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 50.2% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | 432.57 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 4% | 3.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Ring-2.6-1T?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#74); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Ring-2.6-1T share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.