Model comparison
Hy4 preview vs Ring-2.6-1T
Hy4 preview has enough public results to be ranked (#73); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy4 preview leads 51.6 to 40.7.
Side by side
| Hy4 preview | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2026-08-28 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
Math Not comparable
Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy4 preview better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Hy4 preview has enough public results to be ranked (#73); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Hy4 preview or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.