Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs o3-pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.9

Rank #105 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 3 categories and o3-pro in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 45.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 29.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 38.5% for o3-pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and o3-pro specifications
MiMo-V2.5-Proo3-pro
ProviderXiaomiOpenAI
Noometry Index45.242.9
Released2026-04-222025-06-10
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M200K
Max output131K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$20
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$80
Results tracked2712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-Proo3-pro
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
LMArena WebDev1479—
SciCode50.2%—
WeirdML—58.2%
LMArena Coding1503—
ALE-Bench899.8—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-Proo3-pro
DTBench84.5%86.9%
LMCA29.5%38.5%
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.1%
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%—
ARC-AGI-1—59.3%
CritPt4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1488—
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.42

Math Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-Proo3-pro
ProofBench22%—
LMArena Math1481—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-Proo3-pro
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.3%
LMArena Expert1503—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), o3-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-Proo3-pro
LMArena Non-English1449—
LMArena Chinese1507—
LMArena French1488—
LMArena German1458—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1437—
LMArena Russian1450—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), o3-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-Proo3-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1477—

Long Context o3-pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-Proo3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench—97.2%
LMArena Longer Query1483—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-Proo3-pro
LMArena Text1465—
LMArena Creative Writing1440—
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1493—
EQ-Bench 41208—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than o3-pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or o3-pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 47.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and o3-pro share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper