Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 42.7.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2.5-ProNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderXiaomiNVIDIA
Noometry Index45.235.9
Released2026-04-222024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked2717

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding15031209
LMArena WebDev1479—
SciCode50.2%—
ALE-Bench899.8—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14881202
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%—
CritPt4%—
DTBench84.5%—
LMCA29.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math14811216
ProofBench22%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert15031171

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14491206
LMArena Chinese15071214
LMArena French14881197
LMArena German14581192
LMArena Japanese14121128
LMArena Korean14371148
LMArena Russian14501219
LMArena Spanish14711195

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14771203

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14831225

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text14651225
LMArena Creative Writing14401203
LMArena Multi-Turn14771214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1493—
EQ-Bench 41208—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper