Noometry

Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 32.0.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.945.3
Released2024-06-142026-06-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding12091473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts12021460
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.37

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math12161466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Expert11711467
GPQA Diamond—87.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English12061445
LMArena Chinese12141510
LMArena French11971473
LMArena German11921471
LMArena Japanese11281413
LMArena Korean11481415
LMArena Russian12191457
LMArena Spanish11951457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12031440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query12251455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text12251455
LMArena Creative Writing12031439
LMArena Multi-Turn12141460

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper