Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.4 to 36.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 34.4% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 12.9% for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 40.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | 1264 |
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | 1461 |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | 12.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.35 |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1431 |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | 1432 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1223 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1442 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1458 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1415 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1374 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | 993 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.