Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax M1
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax M1 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 53.1.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.55 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 40.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.55 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | 1359 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | — |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1339 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1361 |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | 1317 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1370 |
| LMArena German | 1458 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | 1353 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1312 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1335 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than MiniMax M1?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniMax M1?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.55 and $2.20.
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniMax M1 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiniMax M1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.