Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 5.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.5

Rank #148 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 49.6.
  • Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Granite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index40.545.2
Released—2026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K1.05M
Max output118K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$0.87
Results tracked1127

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding13801503
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
ALE-Bench—899.8

Reasoning Too close to call

Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts13291488
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
CritPt—4%
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProofBench—22%
LMArena Math—1481

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert13841503

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English13021449
LMArena Chinese13661507
LMArena Russian12851450
LMArena French—1488
LMArena German—1458
LMArena Japanese—1412
LMArena Korean—1437
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following13011477

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query13241483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text13201465
LMArena Creative Writing12361440
LMArena Multi-Turn13011477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 5.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 40.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper